Print omitted frames count for short backtrace mode#112843
Print omitted frames count for short backtrace mode#112843bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
|
r? @m-ou-se (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
|
These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
m-ou-se
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks okay to me. Just two suggestions:
41f4ee4 to
9378c73
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
@rustbot ready |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #113046) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
d5407b1 to
9f72cb4
Compare
|
@rustbot ready |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #113176) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
9f72cb4 to
809ef24
Compare
|
@rustbot ready |
|
Seems m-ou-se's comments were addressed! |
…e, r=workingjubilee Print omitted frames count for short backtrace mode Fixes rust-lang#111730
298ea5d to
2eb2f17
Compare
|
📌 Commit 2eb2f17db146e2cbd94685c9f604b004da10a75a has been approved by It is now in the queue for this repository. |
|
⌛ Testing commit 2eb2f17db146e2cbd94685c9f604b004da10a75a with merge 5f486f777c84833a52a30754663621505541185f... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
2eb2f17 to
7b3d1b7
Compare
|
Hmm, one more go. If this still doesn't pass then I think we should reassess this and approach it more systematically. @bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (d4145ee): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDEDNext Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Bootstrap: 653.169s -> 653.113s (-0.01%) |
|
That's a really wild shift... |
Yep, the hard thing for strip backtrace message is different arch may have trivial difference, and I don't have a x64_linux in my local env :( |
Interesting... |
|
Seems like the start of noise:
@rustbot label: perf-regression-triaged |

Fixes #111730